The wildfire profiteers: Insurance, corruption, and the Democratic Party’s complicity

The devastation from the Palisades Fire is shown in an aerial view in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles, Monday, January 27, 2025. [AP Photo/Jae C. Hong]

The recent Los Angeles wildfires have laid bare a stark reality: the Democratic Party, rather than advocating for the common worker, remains a loyal defender of corporate interests—particularly the predatory insurance industry. In the wake of a disaster that claimed 29 lives, displaced over 200,000 residents, and damaged or destroyed more than 18,000 structures, with economic losses estimated between $250 billion and $275 billion, the industry has once again revealed its deeply exploitative nature.

Central to this crisis is State Farm, a large insurance conglomerate that initially took advantage of market conditions for profit but then abruptly dropped policyholders when it became financially unfeasible. The narrative of State Farm’s aggressive push into high-risk wildfire areas in California, its deliberate underpricing of policies, and its eventual abandonment of thousands of homeowners illustrates the deep-seated class conflicts between working individuals and the corporate elite, along with the state.

For years, State Farm marketed itself as the insurer of last resort in California’s fire-prone areas, eagerly capturing market share from competitors who considered the risks too great. By 2022, it had claimed over 20 percent of the state’s homeowners’ insurance market, raking in $2.7 billion in premiums in 2023 alone. This was not an act of goodwill but a strategic risk, driven by artificially low premiums that attracted policyholders while generating substantial commissions for agents.

During this time, Michael Tipsord served as State Farm’s CEO and Chairman. As of 2023, his net worth was estimated to be between $100 million and $125 million. In 2022, he received total compensation of around $24.4 million, which included a base salary of $2.4 million and a bonus of $21.9 million.

Internal warnings about the unsustainable nature of State Farm’s strategy were ignored. Company actuaries repeatedly signaled that the California subsidiary’s premiums were inadequate, while external consultants flagged the increasing risk of catastrophic wildfires. Yet, State Farm executives prioritized short-term market domination over long-term sustainability. A few months before the 2025 wildfires struck, the company abruptly abandoned policyholders by dropping 30,000 homeowners, including nearly 10,000 in the very areas that burned.

This cycle of reckless expansion followed by strategic retreat exposes the true function of private insurance companies: they are not institutions designed to protect individuals from catastrophe, but financial mechanisms for extracting wealth. The moment risk outweighs profitability, insurers withdraw, leaving working people and middle class homeowners to fend for themselves.

The insurance industry, like the banking sector, wields immense economic and political power. State Farm, as the largest home and auto insurer in the country, is deeply intertwined with both the Democratic and Republican parties. These political factions, both subservient to the dictates of big business, have facilitated an environment in which insurers can act with impunity.

In 2023, after State Farm and other insurers began threatening to pull out of California altogether, two-term California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara played an essential role in favor of the insurance industry. The state regulator swiftly approved massive rate increases up to 20 percent while hypocritically adopting a “sustainable insurance strategy” that effectively legitimized the industry’s demands for deregulation.

California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara in a Sacramento, California on Thursday, Sept. 21, 2023. [AP Photo/Adam Beam]

This was followed by further increase requests up to an additional 30 percent in June 2024. Lara’s deputy, Michael Soller, summarized the role of the state in facilitating the insurance companies’ profits: “Under the new rules, insurance companies cannot retreat from California if they want to do business here.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top